People with disabilities are important and they deserve to be happy, safe and cared for

– Sherry (Parent of a person with disability)

(DRC Final Report Volume 1: Voices of people with disability – Book 2)

What was the DRC?

The Disability Royal Commission (DRC) was a national inquiry into the violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation experienced by people with disability in Australia.

Established in 2019, the Commission heard directly from people with disability, families, carers, and advocates across the country through public hearings, private sessions, submissions and community engagement.

Based on this evidence, the Commission identified widespread systemic failures and made 222 recommendations to improve safety, rights and inclusion for people with disability.

The final report released in September 2023, provides a clear roadmap across key areas of life — including education, employment, housing, justice, and disability services.

Quick facts: Disability Royal Commission

  • Engagement: 32 public hearings, 1785 private hearings, 7944 formal submissions, 700 community engagement activities, 17824 phone enquiries.
  • Final report released: September 2023
  • Total recommendations: 222
  • Report structure: 12 volumes (8 with recommendations)
  • Focus: Safety, rights, inclusion, and accountability
QIDAN response to the Child Safety Inquiry

Why the DRC Still Matters

The Disability Royal Commission matters because it:

  • centres the lived experience of people with disability.
  • exposes systemic failures across multiple sectors.
  • provides a clear, evidence-based roadmap for reform.
  • highlights the need for independent accountability and long-term change.

However, recommendations do not create change on their own. They must be implemented — and governments must be held accountable for delivering on what was promised.

What happens after a Royal Commission ends?

Once a Royal Commission hands down its final report, responsibility shifts to governments to respond to and implement the recommendations.

In the case of the Disability Royal Commission:

  • governments committed to respond to the 222 recommendations.
  • progress reporting was promised through national and state processes.
  • implementation was expected to be monitored over time.

 

However, progress has been slow and inconsistent, with many recommendations showing little to no movement. Independent monitoring is essential to ensure the intent of the DRC is not lost.

Timeline

Apr 2019
DRC established

The Disability Royal Commission (DRC) was set up as a national inquiry into the experiences of people with disability in Australia.

Apr 2019 - Sep 2023
Stories of lived experiences

The DRC heard stories of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of people with disability, including systemic failures.

Sep 2023
Final Report

The DRC published its findings in a final report comprising 12 volumes and included 222 recommendations.

Sep 2024
Reform Roadmap released

The Disability Reform Ministerial Council released a Disability Reform Roadmap for 2024 and 2025.

Dec 2024
QIDAN position paper

QIDAN provided a submission outlining its position on the DRC recommendations and how governments have responded.

Dec 2024
Interim Update

State and territory governments released a National Interim Update outlining their progress on the DRC recommendations.

Nov 2025
First Progress Report

The Australian government published its first national implementation progress report including updates from each state.

May 2026
Campaign launched

QIDAN launched its campaign #TheDRCStillMatters to push for awareness and government accountability on the DRC.

What did the Disability Royal Commission recommend?

The final report consists of 12 volumes, each focusing on a different issue or system. Eight of these volumes include recommendations.

Below is a high-level overview of each volume and the key areas it addresses. Our tracker examines what governments have done in response to each of these recommendations. recommendations.

Volumes 1-3: Background and context

These volumes explain:

  • Why the Disability Royal Commission was established.
  • How it operated.
  • What evidence and lived experiences were shared.

These volumes do not include recommendations, but provide important context.

Read the final report on volumes 1-3:

Volume 4: Human rights and legal protections

Focus: Disability rights in Australia

The Commission found that Australia is not fully meeting its human rights obligations to people with disability.

Key recommendations include:

  • Strengthen legal protections.
  • Align Australian laws with international human rights standards.
  • Improving accountability when rights are breached.

 

Read the final report on Volume 4.

Volume 5: Disability leadership and governance

Focus: Government leadership and coordination

This volume highlights gaps in how disability policy is led and coordinated across governments.

Key recommendations include:

  • Establishing a National Disability Commission.
  • Embedding lived experience in leadership and decision-making.
  • Improving coordination across governments and systems.

 

Read the final report on Volume 5.

Volume 6: Access, autonomy and independence

Focus: Choice and control

This volume centres the right of people with disability to make decisions about their own lives.

Key recommendations include:

  • Promoting dignity, autonomy and self-determination.
  • Removing barriers to access.
  • Strengthening supports that enable independence.

 

Read the final report on Volume 6.

Volume 7: Inclusive education, employment and housing

Focus: Everyday systems and participation

This volume examines barriers across:

  • Education
  • Employment
  • Housing

Key recommendations include:

  • Ending segregation in education, employment and housing.
  • Improving access to inclusive schooling, jobs and housing.
  • Increasing access to safe, accessible, and affordable housing.

 

Read the final report on Volume 7.

Volume 8: Disability and the criminal justice system

Focus: Justice and overrepresentation

The Commission found that people with disability are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and face higher risks of harm.

Key recommendations include:

  • Reducing incarceration and harm experienced by people with disability.
  • Strengthening legal safeguards.
  • Raising the age of criminal responsibility.

 

Read the final report on Volume 8.

Volume 9: First Nations people with disability

Focus: Intersection of disability and First Nations experiences

This volume highlights the compounded and intersecting discrimination and systemic barriers faced by First Nations people with disability.

Key recommendations include

  • Addressing systemic racism and discrimination.
  • Ensuring culturally safe services.
  • Strengthening First Nations leadership and self-determination.

 

Read the final report on Volume 9.

Volume 10: Disability services and supports (including NDIS)

Focus: Service quality and safety

This volume examines how disability services operate in practice.

Key recommendations include:

  • Strengthening safeguards against abuse and neglect.
  • Improving service quality and provider accountability.
  • Enhancing oversight of disability service systems.

 

Read the final report on Volume 10.

Volume 11: Oversight, complaints and accountability

Focus: Independent monitoring

This volume focuses on the systems that should prevent harm and respond when things go wrong.

Key recommendations include:

  • Strengthening complaints mechanisms.
  • Improving independent oversight.
  • Ensuring systems respond effectively to harm.

 

Read the final report on Volume 11.

Volume 12: Implementation, monitoring and reporting

Focus: Turning recommendations into action

This volume sets out how governments should implement and track progress.

Key recommendations include:

  • Transparent public reporting.
  • Independent monitoring of progress.
  • Clear accountability frameworks.

Read the final report on Volume 12.

What happens next? Tracking progress on the 222 recommendations

Governments are responsible for implementing the Disability Royal Commission recommendations.

Independent, disability-led monitoring helps ensure:

  • Progress is visible.
  • Commitments are scrutinised.
  • The intent of the DRC is upheld over time.

 

This is why tracking implementation, not just publishing reports matters. Our work helps ensure the DRC leads to real, lasting change.